A proposal

[benlehman]

There seems to be great confusion about the use of the term Simulationism. To paraphrase Vincent, a lot of people want the word to mean something that is cooler than it is. Further, most of these people seem to talk about it in terms of a set of techniques for enhancing the "reality" of the experience.

I'd like to propose that there exists a set set of techniques, compatible with any creative agenda which encompasses what these people are talking about when they say "simulationism."

I'd like to propose calling these techniques "plausibility techniques" as a whole, with the subsets of "fidelity techniques" and "immersion techniques." The essential idea is that the goal is to render a plausible gameworld, and that this is achieved via two means: One is rules which make the game adhere to certain requirements, the other is an immersion which brings players into a trance-state where they will accept the strangeness of the world as reasonable and true.

Those two subsets are not the entireity of plausibility techniques -- there are other types, I'm sure.

How does that sound to other people?

Comments

[yeloson.livejournal.com]

I think the great confusion for most people is that they assume that Narrativism or Gamism means zero plausibility, zero fidelity, and zero immersion...

[matt-rah.livejournal.com]

So, what *is* Sim then? Arrrgh.

Matt, who knows he needs to read more of the Forge before really getting into one of these discussions

[locke61dv.livejournal.com]

I think if we moved CA from a Taxonomy to a Folksonomy, we'd be all right. No, that won't make any more sense when I'm sober.

So you seem right, although there's some semantic fallout (I worry you're pushing the definition of 'plausibility' out side where it's intuitive meaning wants to be). Also, are there any games where you *don't* want plausibility techniques?

[lordsmerf.livejournal.com]

Ben,

I'm sort of with you, and sort of not. I couldn't keep up with that discussion on Anyway past about post 45 or so...

One is rules which make the game adhere to certain requirements, the other is an immersion which brings players into a trance-state where they will accept the strangeness of the world as reasonable and true.

The thing is, for some people this is one of the by whys of play. Not for me, but I definitely know and have played with people who roleplay to get this. Now, I suppose that you could argue that there are people who play in order to exercise Scene Framing techniques, but that's probably more of a stretch.

So, these techniques really are a Creative Agenda in some cases.

My real problem with GNS theory is that the categories are treated as absolutes. It's generally thought that a game only facilitates one of the CAs. Then I look at Capes and see a game that firmly straddles the Gamist/Narrativist line. It's a competition to address theme. (This, by the way, is where I see Vincent's diagram breaking down. It's not a binary choice Address Theme OR Compete, they're two entirely different things and can both be present.)

I guess what I'm saying is that this problem we have with discussions of Simulationism (what it is exactly and all that) could be equally applied to Narrativism and Gamism.

So, yeah, GNS is useful, but not nearly as useful now as it probably was at its inception. You know... I think I'll put this in my LJ...

Thomas

[apollinax.livejournal.com]

One is rules which make the game adhere to certain requirements,

Too vague. The same could be said for G or N or, really, most any rule.

If you said "make the world adhere to certain requirements," then I think you might be closer to the mark. Sim rules are intended to model the environment within the shared blah blah etc.

[crnixon.livejournal.com]

Ben,

Exactly what I've thought for a long time. "Fidelity," my friend. That's what to call it, and that's what it is: a commitment to plausibility, defined by the group by a certain set of guidelines, usually either based in physical laws or adherence to certain genre conventions.

[keirgreeneyes.livejournal.com]

More power to ya, Ben. Now to inject this into the main stream.