A proposal

[benlehman]

There seems to be great confusion about the use of the term Simulationism. To paraphrase Vincent, a lot of people want the word to mean something that is cooler than it is. Further, most of these people seem to talk about it in terms of a set of techniques for enhancing the "reality" of the experience.

I'd like to propose that there exists a set set of techniques, compatible with any creative agenda which encompasses what these people are talking about when they say "simulationism."

I'd like to propose calling these techniques "plausibility techniques" as a whole, with the subsets of "fidelity techniques" and "immersion techniques." The essential idea is that the goal is to render a plausible gameworld, and that this is achieved via two means: One is rules which make the game adhere to certain requirements, the other is an immersion which brings players into a trance-state where they will accept the strangeness of the world as reasonable and true.

Those two subsets are not the entireity of plausibility techniques -- there are other types, I'm sure.

How does that sound to other people?

Comments

[lordsmerf.livejournal.com]

Ah, okay. You're not saying that there isn't a Creative Agenda to be associated with Immersion (and the like), you're saying that people are conflating the Creative Agenda with the techniques that are commonly used to achieve it.

If that's what you're saying, then I apologize for all this. We're on the same page, I agree with you totally. Sorry 'bout all that.

Thomas