posted by [identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com at 09:02pm on 01/02/2005
I guess this comes down to "Ben tends to give a generous reading to old RPG stuff, J tends to give a pessimistic reading." Not much can be said about that.

I do think that AD&D is a giant heap of interesting techniques, though. Ron (http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/20/) is right, in his essay. The original D&D is unplayable. Everyone fixed it in different ways, and a lot of those fixes were hybridized together to make AD&D. AD&D didn't work, but it has all these bits and pieces of different people's functional systems. It is a brilliant idea mine.

Look at the Random Event tables in Oriental Adventures and tell me that Jeff Grubb and Zeb Cook weren't using Random Encounters in the exact same way I was using them above.

yrs--
--Ben
 
posted by [identity profile] nikotesla.livejournal.com at 05:21pm on 02/02/2005
I guess this comes down to "Ben tends to give a generous reading to old RPG stuff, J tends to give a pessimistic reading." Not much can be said about that.

Well, sure, something can be said. What can be said is that the rules encourage social misfunction and your group is too functional to fall for it.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31