On Role Playing, Literature, and Acting : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
| 14 |
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
In the creator aspect, each of them has the quality of starting from an initial seed or collection of basic information and expanding into something much richer. And in all three, some measure of worth is based on the degree, complexity, and delicacy of the expansion.
I suppose these things could be summed up by saying 'they are all art', though.
(no subject)
I would like to note that this participatory/creator aspect and observer aspect are so tightly linked in RPG that distinguishing between the two is vanishingly difficult, and I think that that is a big source of what makes RPGs cool.
In fact, the only other form of human expression where creator, participant, and observer are so closely linked may well be Myth.
yrs--
--Ben
(no subject)
(no subject)
yrs--
--Ben
(no subject)
It is a lot like filming a movie out of order.