benlehman: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] benlehman at 01:47pm on 23/10/2009
I am shopping for a new backpack, as my beloved nearly decade-old samsonite which is finally nearing the end of its life.

I am struck by how much *worse* backpack design has gotten over the last decade. Examples: it's harder to reach things, pockets are so deep that they go to my elbow, external pockets are located inaccessibly if they exist at all.

This got me thinking: how did this happen? And it occurs to me that UI decays naturally over time, as features are added.

When a new feature is added, it is generally just grafted on to a pre-existing design. As it gets increasingly "dug-in," it occupies more and more of the design space. And, thus, it basically kills any usability of the pre-existing design. In order to get a usable item again, we have to redesign the thing from scratch, taking into account new usage patterns, etc.

A lot of features have been added to backpacks in the last few years (laptop sleeves, ipod cases, cell phone thinguses, etc.) At the same time, this has made the rest of the pack cluttered, poorly designed, and unusable.

I think that this probably applies to a lot of things. For instance, I bet Jono could talk about it with software.
There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by (anonymous) at 10:35pm on 23/10/2009
That's funny, I just went through this, replacing the rucksack I bought 12 years ago in West Yellowstone, and, yeah, it's amazing how stupid backpacks have gotten since then. I always look at things and think "how is this going to break?" and maybe the reason there are so many bullshit straps and cords is so you can still carry things after the weight in the main compartment blows out the zipper, leaving the whole main part useless. Nine out of ten new backpacks seemed designed that way.

I did find a good solution: Target carries a line of Jansport packs specifically designed to be cheap. The fabric isn't quite as good as my old one, but the cheapness subverts the design bullshit, which leaves you with a decent, old-school pack after all.
 
posted by [identity profile] kiddens.livejournal.com at 04:36am on 24/10/2009
Yeah, actually this is the crux of why Microsoft created the "ribbon" for the current version of Office. While it may or may not be the right UI solution, the problem was that they discovered that features in Office over the years (especially toolbars of features) had crowded out basic functionality. If your main work area is taking up only about 40% of your screen real estate, you have a problem.
 
posted by [identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com at 10:02pm on 24/10/2009
Yeah, I'm not sure it's a fix but it's necessary. Something has to clean out the spiderwebs.
 
posted by [identity profile] ivan23.livejournal.com at 04:35pm on 24/10/2009
I can't even begin to tell you how true this is in Web design. The bigger the company, the more the features, the worse things get. Never occurred to me, though; so I tip my hat (as usual).

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31