posted by [identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com at 09:23pm on 29/07/2008
Do you have an extra a, b, c, d style option? I'd be glad to hear it. I wrote down the ones I can think of, which is a necessity of a choose your own adventure style scenario.

Or is the false dichotomy atheism/theism. In which case: hahahahahah*!

yrs--
--Ben

* I am neither an atheist nor a theist.
 
posted by [identity profile] wickedthought.livejournal.com at 09:32pm on 29/07/2008
Let me take your test.

1) Consider a hypothetical world in which there is a study that conclusively proves that certain aspects of religious practice, or the practice of particular religion, has an immediate benefit to your health. (I'm aware that such studies exist in the real world, but they're flawed. I'm asking you to consider one that, to your eyes, is conclusive.)

a) Okay -> Go to 2.
b) I would never find such studies conclusive, regardless of the methodology or repeated results -> Go to END.
c) I cannot imagine such a world -> Go to END.


Let's not use hypetheticals. Let's do what Machiavelli suggested and use reality.

Prayer doesn't cure anything. Never has, never will.
Religious belief doesn't cure anything. Never has, never will.
A patient's positive attitude is beneficial to medical processes. This can come from visits from friends, good bedside manner from the doctor, knowledge of the disease and its treatments, and--yes--an irrational belief that an invisible man is looking out for you. But belief in any particular religion does not provide a direct benefit to health.

That should make the rest of your questions irrelevant.
 
posted by [identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com at 09:37pm on 29/07/2008
Let's not use hypetheticals. Let's do what Machiavelli suggested and use reality.

Now you're not taking my test.

Do you have something against fiction? Do you have something against fiction which asks "what would you do, placed into this fictional world?"

The funny thing is that I know you're capable of imagining a world where magic works.

Hmm... That might help. Look at it this way: It's a role-playing game.

If we sit down to play, oh, I dunno, L5R. And I go "actually, there wasn't any functional magic in Japan!" the first time someone casts a spell, that's just me being a dick.

yrs--
--Ben

P.S. The goal of this test is not to convert you. I don't even know what I would convert you to.
 
posted by [identity profile] wunderworks.livejournal.com at 11:32pm on 29/07/2008
Okay, let's say _I_ take this test of yours - and let's use a real world example - meditation used by Buddhists monks lowers blood pressure.

I would answer as follows:

1. a - it's conclusive
2. b - start using it
3. c - still an atheist
4. a - still rational

Why? Because the study finds that Correlation does not Imply Causation.

Just because the Buddhist monks discovered a practice that helps them be healthier, doesn't mean it has anything to do with their religion.

The Shinto Japanese lived longer during the Middle Ages because they used ritual Purification and regular bathing as religious practices. Does being clean and dangerous microbe free have health benefits? Yes! Is it a matter of religion or faith? Not really. Can there be such a test where Faith or religion cannot be parsed from the results? No.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31