posted by [identity profile] yeloson.livejournal.com at 11:02pm on 03/04/2008
You know, I rarely read Confucious. There's parts that are pure gold, and then there's parts that... ahh, irritate me to no end.
 
posted by [identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com at 11:09pm on 03/04/2008
It's important to remember that he saw himself largely as a keeper of the traditional Zhou culture.

We have *no fucking clue* what traditional Zhou culture was like.
 
posted by [identity profile] yeloson.livejournal.com at 11:15pm on 03/04/2008
Well, I'm also aware of the fact that text tends to get diluted over time with additions and deletions depending on who's in charge at the moment. It's hard to tell whether the irritating stuff was original or added.
 
posted by [identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com at 11:22pm on 03/04/2008
Almost certainly both.

It's hard to even imagine that a petty Chinese noble from 2700 years ago would %100 share a value set with a modern Chinese-American.

It's kind of amazing how much of it is still relevant at all.
 
posted by [identity profile] yeloson.livejournal.com at 11:39pm on 03/04/2008
Oh, for sure. Though I think human nature hasn't drastically changed over the last few thousand years, so it being relevant isn't surprising to me.
summercomfort: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] summercomfort at 01:12am on 04/04/2008
But it is! Crazy. Reading Confucius helped me understand my parents. Even though they grew up in a generation that didn't read Confucius.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31