benlehman: (Default)
benlehman ([personal profile] benlehman) wrote2011-04-23 06:44 pm

Let's talk!

Hey, Atheists: Remember all the fun we used to have on this journal? Man, that was a good time.

So here's a thing: On the balance, would you rather live in a country that -- while guaranteeing freedom of religion -- required all office holders to be atheist? Why or why not?

I'd be really interested to hear answers from my Dawkins-fan friends.

Religious folks, you can play too: Answer the same question but for your faith.



My answer: I have no idea how such a country would even function (agnosticism / deism isn't exactly ... rigorously testable) and I wouldn't anyway. Diversity is strength and all that.

yes.

[identity profile] kitsuchan.livejournal.com 2011-04-25 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
And suddenly instead of making excuses for not having attended church in five years, all those politicians would be making it a point of pride.

Re: yes.

[identity profile] bakeneko.livejournal.com 2011-04-25 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
That's really hilarious to imagine X3