benlehman: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] benlehman at 11:08am on 06/01/2005

Who's been commenting in your journal?


1 [livejournal.com profile] benlehman 150 comments 28.96% of total
2 [livejournal.com profile] relevance 35 comments 6.76% of total
3 [livejournal.com profile] wirednavi 23 comments 4.44% of total
4 [livejournal.com profile] matt_rah 23 comments 4.44% of total
5 [livejournal.com profile] rich_forest 20 comments 3.86% of total
6 [livejournal.com profile] funwithrage 19 comments 3.67% of total
7 [livejournal.com profile] taranhero 18 comments 3.47% of total
8 [livejournal.com profile] silvergoose 17 comments 3.28% of total
9 [livejournal.com profile] evilmagnus 15 comments 2.9% of total
10 [livejournal.com profile] xiombarg 14 comments 2.7% of total
11 [livejournal.com profile] arianhwyvar 13 comments 2.51% of total
12 [livejournal.com profile] psychotropek 13 comments 2.51% of total
13 [livejournal.com profile] unrequitedthai 12 comments 2.32% of total
14 Anonymous 9 comments 1.74% of total
15 [livejournal.com profile] bicoastal 9 comments 1.74% of total
16 [livejournal.com profile] emergent 8 comments 1.54% of total
17 [livejournal.com profile] greywords 7 comments 1.35% of total
18 [livejournal.com profile] meiganren 7 comments 1.35% of total
19 [livejournal.com profile] conspiratrix 7 comments 1.35% of total
20 [livejournal.com profile] marcus_sez_vote 6 comments 1.16% of total
21 [livejournal.com profile] dj_clawson 6 comments 1.16% of total
22 [livejournal.com profile] russiandude 6 comments 1.16% of total
23 [livejournal.com profile] timeritual 6 comments 1.16% of total
24 [livejournal.com profile] redcrosse 5 comments 0.97% of total
25 [livejournal.com profile] fructivore 5 comments 0.97% of total
26 [livejournal.com profile] foreign_devilry 5 comments 0.97% of total
27 [livejournal.com profile] bigbluebackpack 5 comments 0.97% of total
28 [livejournal.com profile] shatterdaymorn 5 comments 0.97% of total
29 [livejournal.com profile] mazarin 4 comments 0.77% of total
30 [livejournal.com profile] chrislehrich 4 comments 0.77% of total
31 [livejournal.com profile] locke61dv 4 comments 0.77% of total
32 [livejournal.com profile] thestealthyone 3 comments 0.58% of total
33 [livejournal.com profile] denyse 3 comments 0.58% of total
34 [livejournal.com profile] damidnara 3 comments 0.58% of total
35 [livejournal.com profile] crnixon 3 comments 0.58% of total
36 [livejournal.com profile] noradannan 3 comments 0.58% of total
37 [livejournal.com profile] salda007 3 comments 0.58% of total
38 [livejournal.com profile] egowumpus 2 comments 0.39% of total
39 [livejournal.com profile] kiddens 2 comments 0.39% of total
40 [livejournal.com profile] iralith 2 comments 0.39% of total
41 [livejournal.com profile] gesturejester 2 comments 0.39% of total
42 [livejournal.com profile] goofnose 2 comments 0.39% of total
43 [livejournal.com profile] apollinax 1 comments 0.19% of total
44 [livejournal.com profile] labyrinth_ghoul 1 comments 0.19% of total
45 [livejournal.com profile] lumpley 1 comments 0.19% of total
46 [livejournal.com profile] w0lfstar 1 comments 0.19% of total
47 [livejournal.com profile] aumshantih 1 comments 0.19% of total
48 [livejournal.com profile] ornithoptercat 1 comments 0.19% of total
49 [livejournal.com profile] wheeloffire 1 comments 0.19% of total
50 [livejournal.com profile] greymalkin42 1 comments 0.19% of total
51 [livejournal.com profile] heyunyi 1 comments 0.19% of total
52 [livejournal.com profile] protagoras 1 comments 0.19% of total

These statistics were generated using the LJ Stats Web Interface by [profile] mpnolan. Original idea from [profile] scrapdog's LJ Comment Stats Wizard.
benlehman: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] benlehman at 12:32pm on 06/01/2005
Eric Burns is my hero. For many reasons, really.

But especially for this.

If you are angry at them, read it. For any value of them.

http://www.websnark.com/archives/2005/01/the_twelfth_com.html#comments
benlehman: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] benlehman at 04:27pm on 06/01/2005
This is an RPG design post. It isn't a Forge post simply because it isn't focused enough to be. You have been warned.

As Vincent points out, we have the whole form of conflict resolution and resolution mechanics in general pretty much down. This is a monumental amount of work over a monumental amount of time, originating in the murky depths of the 80s and carrying through until the present day games of Dogs, HeroQuest, and Primetime Adventures. There is still a lot of work to be done, of course, but now we can classify it and really make it work.

But that doesn't mean that RPG design is done, or that it is all about refining conflict resolution mechanisms.

I want to talk about something else. I want to talk about non-conflict, non-task mechanism.

It is a sign of how hideously underdeveloped these mechanics and the theory surrounding them is that I cannot think of anything to say about these sorts of mechanics. RPG theorists (and here I am using a broad category) have, for a very long time, reducing RPG systems into their resolution systems (whether conflict or task resolution isn't really important to this point) and dismissed other aspects of RPG system as unnecessary cruft, or simply didn't recognize their existence entirely.

And I think it is time that we start to analyze them.

Here are some examples:
The chart in Polaris, and it's predecessor diagram in Sorcerer.
The Random Dungeon generation tables of AD&D1
The direct "use this game for this" instructions
Town generation in D&D3, and its predecessors in Spelljammer system generation charts and Thief's Handbook guild and city generation rules
Oriental Adventures (1st) random events charts
non-combat movement and maneuvering rules, including travel but also swimmingly, climbing and flight.

How can we categorize these things? How can we study them? How can we make them more graceful? How can we make them more fun?

Right now we are groping in the dark. We have no idea what these things mean. We throw them together, and see if they stick. Sometimes they are awesome, sometimes they aren't, but there is no understanding, yet. We are monkeys with typewriters.

Anyone want to start?

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31