benlehman: (Default)
benlehman ([personal profile] benlehman) wrote2008-05-17 07:33 pm

Stories from the Sichuan earthquake

A lot of the coverage of the Sichuan earthquake in the English press has been negative: not terribly surprising, given the general state of China in the English language press.

A group of Chinese-speaking internetters have taken it upon themselves to translate a bunch of Chinese stories about the earthquake, culling them from blogs and newspapers. These are not stories about the government. These are mostly stories about individual people and their struggles to help others.

I'm not saying that these are necessarily all there is to the story. I'm just saying: reading couldn't hurt.

[identity profile] redcrosse.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 05:43 am (UTC)(link)
The BBC coverage of the Sichuan earthquake has actually been pretty positive, lauding the Chinese government for a rapid response and for broad and gracious acceptance of international aid. I haven't checked into the American news, but it might just be us, and not "The (Monolithic, Cyclopaean, and Possibly Amorphous) English Press".

Naturally, the coverage of the earthquake itself is very, very negative, as it hurt a lot of people, but, you know, it's an earthquake. Hard to put a really positive spin on most of those.

[identity profile] gbsteve.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I was just watching the BBC news and I'd agree with this. It was mostly about the terrible extent to which Sichuan has been devastated but also showed the rescue effor in a good light.

The BBC website page (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/asia_pacific/2008/china_quake/default.stm) on the earthquake seems generally OK too.

[identity profile] benlehman.livejournal.com 2008-05-19 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, okay, clearly I eat crow on this.

Crow eaten.