Creative Process and Critique
(Context: A friend of mine and a friend of his have recently been going around telling creative communities that they aren't creating right, that they should follow a different method and different process. Not coincidentally one which those two people have used in the past.)
I think that other people have a right to judge my published work. (for a general value of "my").
If I don't want it judged, by not publishing it, I avoid judgement.
Do other people have a right to judge my creative process, though? (again, for a general value of "my").
I don't think so, off the top of my head. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.
I think that other people have a right to judge my published work. (for a general value of "my").
If I don't want it judged, by not publishing it, I avoid judgement.
Do other people have a right to judge my creative process, though? (again, for a general value of "my").
I don't think so, off the top of my head. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.
no subject
Which I think is where you and certain parties cross purposes. Their position is driven by a set of norms that are different than the more (sloppy language alert!) "artistic" ones you tend to go with. Theirs - if I read them right - are more about "craftsmanship" and even "professionalism."
Are these works products first, or expressive first? That's an open question, and one the creative community in question hasn't figured out yet.